Artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into software development processes. AI-based code generation and automation are gaining momentum. This development has direct implications for quality assurance. The more development tasks are carried out by machines, the more critical the human role in quality assurance becomes – especially for aspects that go beyond functional correctness.
This article outlines the current state of artificial intelligence in software testing, analyzes its strengths and limitations across various quality assurance activities, and explains why human expertise and structured test management remain essential.
Artificial intelligence in software development is shifting responsibilities
Modern AI-based tools already support requirements analysis, code generation, and test case creation. In some cases, entire test suites can be generated automatically from user stories or specifications. Combined with CI/CD pipelines, this leads to a high degree of autonomy in software delivery.
As a result, the role of quality assurance is changing. It is shifting from pure verification to critical evaluation of AI-generated systems. This includes not only functional testing, but also areas such as security, copyright compliance, ethics, usability, and performance. Human judgment remains essential in all of these.
Manual testing remains a structured human task
AI can support manual testing by identifying risky modules, clustering error logs, or suggesting test ideas based on historical data. However, manual testing still requires types of evaluation that artificial intelligence cannot currently perform.
Typical characteristics of human-led testing include:
- interpreting unclear requirements
- contextualizing observed behavior
- identifying business-critical edge cases
- assessing usability and accessibility
- verifying regulatory and legal compliance
While AI recognizes patterns, it does not question them in a business or social context. Especially when a system functions according to specifications but fails from a user perspective, human involvement is indispensable.
Automated testing offers efficiency but has limits
AI significantly enhances test automation. This includes self-healing locators, dynamic prioritization, and test impact analysis. It also helps stabilize regression tests and manage UI changes.
At the same time, over-automation is emerging as a new challenge. The ease of generating and executing tests leads to ever-larger test suites. However, more tests do not automatically mean more insight. Redundancies, irrelevant tests, and rising maintenance effort can obscure critical risks.
Automation without strategic relevance adds complexity instead of reducing it. AI can optimize execution, but it cannot determine what truly matters. Human experts must continue to decide which scenarios to test, which tests to remove, and how to interpret results.
Test management is the foundation for effective use of AI
Across the entire quality assurance process – from planning to execution to evaluation – AI can only be effective when built on a structured foundation.
Effective test management includes:
- centralized documentation of test cases and coverage
- versioning and traceability of changes
- transparency in defect patterns and risk areas
- integration of manual and automated test processes
AI can support these processes through recommendations, deduplication, and visual analysis. However, without consistent data, its potential remains limited.
In short: AI does not replace good test management. It amplifies what already exists. If test assets are outdated, incomplete, or unstructured, AI will reinforce existing weaknesses instead of resolving them.
Conclusion
Artificial intelligence is already making a noticeable contribution to quality assurance. It increases speed, reveals correlations, and supports decisions – especially in the areas of automation and data analysis.
At the same time, it cannot replace critical thinking, ethical judgment, or strategic test design. The more development is automated, the greater the responsibility that falls to quality assurance – through human reasoning and structured processes.
AI depends on context, and that context is created by people and well-defined systems. A well-managed testing approach is key to aligning AI’s capabilities with real project needs.
The future of software testing is not fully automated – it remains human-led.
Artificial intelligence supports quality assurance, but human expertise and the right tools remain indispensable.
Start for free or connect with Maria Kramer on LinkedIn to dive deeper into the topic!
Last Updated on June 11, 2025 by mgm-marketing
